What is an AI pilot external claim approval log?

It is a controlled register for proposed public claims about an AI pilot, the evidence source behind each claim, owner approval, adviser questions and the final approved or rejected wording.

Does this template prove claims are legal, compliant or accurate?

No. It is an operational evidence and approval template only. Legal, privacy, security, clinical, financial and regulated claims must be reviewed by qualified client owners and advisers.

AI pilot claims · approval log · buyer-safe

AI pilot external claim approval log template.

A practical register for teams preparing AI pilot website copy, sales decks, investor updates or board material. It forces every ROI, safety, accuracy, compliance and production-readiness claim to show evidence, owner approval and unresolved adviser questions before anything goes public.

Download CSV template Use intake questionnaire Read proof policy

Truth boundary

This is a buyer-education and approval-log template, not a real customer case study, testimonial, audit, certification, safety proof, compliance proof, ROI proof, ranking claim, lead, customer or revenue evidence. It does not provide legal, privacy, security, clinical or financial advice. No outreach was sent.

What the log prevents

Unsupported public claims

Stops “safe”, “compliant”, “autonomous”, “production-ready”, “X% savings” or “guaranteed ROI” language from leaving drafts without approved evidence.

Ownerless evidence

Assigns business, product, finance, security, privacy and legal/compliance owners before claims enter decks, websites or outbound material.

Board-review confusion

Separates approved wording, internal-only wording, adviser-needed questions and rejected claims into one decision trail.

Approval log fields

Field	What to capture	Owner	Approve only when	Stop/escalate signal
Claim text	The exact sentence proposed for website, sales, investor, board or partner material.	Marketing/commercial owner	Language is specific, dated and tied to evidence.	Broad terms like guaranteed, compliant, safe, certified, autonomous or proven without qualifier.
Claim category	ROI, cost, accuracy, safety, privacy, compliance, security, uptime, user impact, production readiness or customer outcome.	Business owner	Category risk is understood and the right reviewer is named.	Regulated, clinical, financial, legal or personal-data impact with no adviser queue.
Evidence source	Test result, sampled review, finance report, incident log, pilot metric, red-team note or approved policy excerpt.	Evidence owner	Source is accessible, dated, versioned and repeatable enough for the claim.	Evidence is anecdotal, unavailable, unverifiable or from a different use case.
Scope boundary	Population, geography, workflow, timeframe, model/version, dataset and environment covered by the evidence.	Product/AI owner	Public wording does not exceed the tested scope.	Production, all users, all regions or all workflows implied from a narrow pilot.
Adviser questions	Legal, privacy, security, clinical, finance or compliance questions that must be answered before external use.	Accountable executive	Questions are answered or claim remains internal-only.	Adviser-needed item marked approved without reviewer evidence.
Approved wording	The final public-safe wording, caveats, date, approver and expiry/review date.	Approver	All evidence and boundaries are clear in the final wording.	Claim copied into public material before approval or after expiry.

How AICS uses this log

Review proposed AI pilot claims before website, sales, investor or board reuse.
Map every claim to evidence owners, source documents and scope boundaries.
Move unsupported language into rejected, internal-only or adviser-needed status.
Produce a clean approval trail for the board risk register and production go/no-go decision.

Board risk register template · Go/no-go decision record · Diagnostic package · More resources